Research use only. All simulations are in silico — not validated for regulatory submissions.
Drug Development

Simulate drug programs before they fail

90% of Phase II failures are translation failures. DNAI's mechanistic simulation platform helps pharma teams translate preclinical data, design smarter trials, and rescue shelved compounds — all in silico.

Translational de-risking
Trial design enrichment
Compound rescue

Three workflows. One simulation platform.

Every pharma program hits the same bottlenecks: translation risk, enrollment guesswork, and shelved assets. DNAI addresses each with validated, mechanistic simulation.

Workflow 1

Translational De-risker

“Will this PDX result translate to human?” Physics-constrained domain separation isolates species-specific artifacts from shared tumor biology, giving you a confidence score on every preclinical-to-clinical prediction.

Per-prediction translation confidence (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW)
Resistance timeline forecast via clonal dynamics simulation
Works with your PDX models — bring your own preclinical data
You get
Simulated human response + translation confidence + resistance forecast
90% of Phase II failures are translation failures
Workflow 2

Trial Design Autopilot

“Who should be in my trial?” DRO-validated enrichment biomarkers identify which molecular subgroups are most likely to respond, with site-robust performance across institutions.

C-index 0.729 on external CGGA cohort (485 held-out glioma, truly independent)
Enrichment biomarkers with ISS triage gating
Validated across 9 external cohorts, 7 institutions
You get
Enrichment criteria + responder subgroups + sample size reduction estimates
Protocol amendments cost $10M+ per occurrence
Workflow 3

Mechanism & Rescue

“Can my failed compound be rescued?” The MechanismOperator maps drug targets across 108 cancer-specific pathways (50 Hallmark + 58 expansion pathways covering immune subprograms, stromal biology, and treatment resistance) and simulates combination strategies to find responsive subgroups.

286 drugs profiled across 108 cancer-specific pathways
Combination screening at rho=0.800 (1,209 pairs)
Subgroup identification via mechanistic pathway scoring
You get
Mechanism report + combination candidates + responsive subgroup profiles
Pharma has $billions in shelved compounds

The Hybrid Engine

Two complementary model paths — data type determines routing

Path A
The Specialist (v3.1)
InputHuman Multi-Omics + WSI
C-index0.704 (internal val)
Optimized forSurvival ranking accuracy
Path B
The Translator (DSN Pipeline)
InputPDX RNA-seq
C-index0.687 (internal val)
Optimized forCross-species robustness

Data-type routing — human clinical data uses Path A; preclinical PDX data uses Path B via DSN.

Validated on External Data

Every prediction comes with a reliability certificate

Validated across 8 external cohorts (245K+ patients). GREEN tier achieves C=0.744 on unseen data. The platform knows when it doesn't know — and tells you.

0.729
External C-index
CGGA (485 held-out glioma)
0.744
GREEN tier C
22% clinical-grade coverage
ρ = 0.800
Combo prediction
1,209 drug pairs validated
42%
Dose optimization
Reduction vs concurrent

Hypothesis generator, not prescription engine.

Every output includes evidence tiers, data sufficiency gates, and structured abstention. We tell you what's worth testing — not what to prescribe.

Primary Use Case

Prioritizing Drug Candidates Early

Your new compound shrinks tumors in mice. Simulate human-scale outcomes in silico to generate hypotheses for your Go/No-Go decision — before investing in Phase II.

Step 1

Drug Calibration (DSN Pipeline)

Your Input
RNA-seq + Tumor volumes from your PDX study
DSN strips mouse stroma signal (murine angiogenesis, etc.)
Imputer reconstructs missing methylation/CNV for complete digital twin
Neural ODE learns drug kill-rate from conserved biology only
Output
Calibrated physics profile free of mouse artifacts
Step 2

Virtual Trial Simulation

Input
9,400+ TCGA digital twins + simulated drug parameters
Apply calibrated drug parameters to human patient cohort
Simulate 12-month trial outcomes in silico
Scenario A
"5% simulated response"
Consider terminating program
Scenario B
"47% in EGFR+ (sim.)"
Enrich trial for EGFR amp.

Enterprise-ready deployment

Single-tenant VPC. Your data never leaves your infrastructure. GxP-compliant audit trails with deterministic replay.

VPC / on-prem deployment21 CFR Part 11 audit trailsSSO / SAML integrationSAS + CDISC exportEd25519 signed outputsDeterministic replay

R&D applications

Trial enrichment

Simulate which patient subgroups show highest response, informing enrollment criteria and reducing required sample sizes.

Mechanism-Based Enrichment

PATHWAY

Use DNAI's pathway-level analysis to find patients with the specific pathway dysregulation your drug targets. Generate mechanism-linked hypotheses — identify which molecular features associate with simulated response. DNA-only Panel Adapter (Mode B) supports 167 gene panels for broader patient coverage.

Pathway-level targetingMoA alignment167 panels (DNA-only)

Combination screening

Predict drug combinations via orthogonal clonal targeting. Validated at ρ=0.800 on 1,209 drug pairs (LTFO ρ=0.689). Explore synergistic pairs and optimal sequencing strategies in silico.

Resistance simulation

Run ensemble simulations of clonal evolution to explore potential resistance mechanisms — with outcome distributions, clone extinction probabilities, and resistance onset timing to inform adaptive treatment protocol design.

Hybrid Control Arms

Generate physics-constrained synthetic patient trajectories for control arms. Modeled potential to reduce control-arm enrollment — enabling more patients to receive experimental treatments.

Dose-Response Optimization

IN SILICO

DNAI's differentiable engine enables PK/PD-constrained schedule optimization that balances simulated efficacy and safety constraints. Achieves 42% dose reduction vs standard concurrent dosing while maintaining equivalent simulated efficacy.

42% dose reductionPK/PD-constrainedIn silico dose-response

Virtual Tumor Burden Endpoints

v3.1

DNAI simulates longitudinal tumor volume trajectories, enabling estimation of tumor burden changes over time. Volume-to-response classification (CR/PR/SD/PD) serves as an approximation of clinical imaging endpoints.

Volume trajectoriesResponse classificationIn silico estimation

Platform Capabilities

How each component supports drug development and research

FeaturePharma Value (Drug Dev)Research Value
DSN (Sim-to-Real)ESSENTIAL
Translate mouse data to human-scale simulations
Background — ensures physics engine uses conserved biology
ImputationESSENTIAL
Use partial preclinical data
Background — handles missing modalities
Neural ODEVIRTUAL TRIAL
Simulate patient cohorts for trial design
PROGNOSIS
Simulate patient trajectories
Safety LayerQC
Flag unreliable PDX models
ABSTENTION
Flag when model cannot reliably simulate
For Pharma
Prioritize the pipeline — simulate before you enroll
For Researchers
Explore the biology — simulate and compare hypotheses
Trial Enrichment

Identify patients most likely to benefit — before enrollment

Simulation suggests up to 10× enrichment in responder prevalence for select cancer types, based on retrospective analysis of observational data.

LGG (Low-Grade Glioma)
All-comers HR0.83
Enriched HR0.42
Simulated N reduction98.7%
log-rank p = 0.003
BRCA (Breast)
All-comers HR0.72
Enriched HR0.61
Simulated N reduction78.3%
log-rank p = 0.076
HNSC (Head & Neck)
All-comers HR0.80
Enriched HR0.52
Simulated N reduction94.0%
log-rank p = 0.18

Methodology & Limitations

  • Based on retrospective analysis of TCGA observational data (N=9,393)
  • CATE estimates from S-learner model with propensity weighting — not randomized trials
  • For hypothesis generation and trial design planning, not efficacy claims
  • All enrichment results require prospective validation in controlled trials
Research Use Only

How Simulation-Based Enrichment Works

Patient Cohort
Multi-omics data
CATE Model
Per-patient benefit
Enriched Arm
Top responders
CATE Selection
Rank patients by predicted treatment benefit; enroll top predicted responders
Glass Cannon Exclusion
Exclude high-benefit but high-fragility patients (unstable responders)
Fragility Filtering
Exclude patients whose predicted response varies widely across model perturbations
Combined Strategy
CATE selection + Glass Cannon exclusion for balanced enrichment with stability

Enrichment Potential by Cancer Type

Retrospective simulation on TCGA data (N=9,393). Enrichment = HR improvement when selecting CATE-predicted top responders.

CancerNAll-Comers HREnriched HREnrichment Potential
LGG5160.830.42Strong
HNSC5210.800.52Strong
BRCA10910.720.61Moderate
ESCA1840.600.25Strong
KIRC5340.830.76Moderate
SARC2551.311.31Insufficient
HR = simulated hazard ratio (enriched vs control arm). All results from observational TCGA data — requires prospective validation.

Known Limitations

Virtual trial response rates are simulated — not validated against real clinical trial outcomes
PDX-to-human translation validated on 128 prostate PDX samples only — other cancer types less validated
Combination synergy and dose-response optimization are exploratory simulations, not clinically validated
All metrics (C-index, ICI, R²) are measured on survival ranking — not drug response prediction

Intended use

DNAI is intended solely as an in silico research tool for hypothesis generation in drug development. It is not validated for regulatory submissions, clinical decision-making, or patient selection. All simulations should be interpreted alongside standard preclinical and clinical evidence.

Run your first simulation

Free retrospective pilot on your data. See translation confidence, enrichment biomarkers, and mechanism reports for your pipeline.

Contact Us